Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Intel Corporation

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXINTC · SEC company no. 50863

Intel Corporation

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
1,806year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
19.8%341 of 1,718 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
10.3%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
7across 3 seasons
76.2% for19.4% against4.4% other19.8% against management1,775 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

1,806 Form N-PX filers reported votes at Intel Corporation for the year to 30 June 2026, across 3 meetings.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 341 of the 1,718 filers that reported a position voted against management (19.8%), 13.3 percentage points above the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 10.3% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
13 May 2026year to 30 June 20261,788919.8%
16 Mar 2026year to 30 June 20263133.3%
5 Jun 2025year to 30 June 20254133.3%
6 May 2025year to 30 June 20251,693836.6%
5 Jul 2024year to 30 June 2024510.0%
7 May 2024year to 30 June 20241,78597.7%
11 May 2023year to 30 June 2024310.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Intel CorporationMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management19.8%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management10.3%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 13 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal C
VanguardForAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRForAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *AgainstFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstFor *Against
SEIAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *AgainstAgainstFor *
NationwideForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainstAgainstFor *
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
MFSForAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesAgainst *AgainstAgainstFor *
AllianceBernsteinForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsAgainst *For *AgainstFor *
DWSForAgainstAgainstAgainst
PIMCOForAgainstAgainstFor *
AllspringForAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VirtusForAgainstAgainstAgainst
VanEckAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo reportNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForNo reportNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanAgainst *AgainstAgainstAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdForNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241,8017.7%withheld
year to 30 June 20251,71536.6%21.1%
year to 30 June 20261,80619.8%10.3%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS34,74859.8%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES8,60914.8%
COMPENSATION4,1797.2%
AUDIT-RELATED2,9655.1%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE2,9315.0%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES2,7414.7%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE1,7833.1%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE1630.3%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE30.0%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Intel Corporation?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 1,718 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Intel Corporation; 341 voted against management (19.8%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Intel Corporation?

Filers reported 3 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 6.7% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Intel Corporation reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Intel Corporation, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.