Home / Companies / Interpump Group SpA / 30 Apr 2026
Interpump Group SpA: meeting of 30 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
70 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Interpump Group SpA meeting of 30 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 12 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 84.6% of reported votes for; 8 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
121 vote records from 59 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 59 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
2 nominees; 52.0% of reported votes for; 51 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
191 vote records from 58 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 58 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
43 vote records from 12 filers. 5 of the 7 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
4 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
333 vote records from 64 filers. 0 of the 58 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
314 vote records from 64 filers. 0 of the 58 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
369 vote records from 64 filers. 0 of the 58 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
14 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
102 vote records from 60 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 59 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
90 vote records from 55 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 54 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
89 vote records from 54 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 54 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
20 vote records from 10 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | Against * | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Dimensional | Against | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Invesco | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Equitable | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | No report | For | Against * | For | For | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| WisdomTree | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Split or no vote | Against * | No report | For | Against | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| MFS | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Against | For | For |
| Allspring | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| American Beacon | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | For | Against | For |
| Lord Abbett | For | Split or no vote | No report | No report | Against | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Interpump Group SpA meeting?
70 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 30 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 5 of 7 voted against management (71.4%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Interpump Group SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Interpump Group SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Interpump Group SpA with a meeting date within three days of 30 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.