Home / Companies / Intershop Holding AG / 27 Mar 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202430 filers reporting

Intershop Holding AG: meeting of 27 Mar 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

30 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Intershop Holding AG meeting of 27 Mar 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

7 nominees; 43.5% of reported votes for; 20 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

288 vote records from 29 filers. 18 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

17.2% for65.5% against17.2% other75.0% against management29 filers

2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

4 vote records from 4 filers. 3 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

25.0% for75.0% against75.0% against management4 filers19.4% for80.6% against80.6% against management464 reported shares

3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

44 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.8% for0.0% against17.2% other0.0% against management29 filers97.3% for0.0% against2.7% other0.0% against management73,348 reported shares

4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

129 vote records from 28 filers. 0 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.1% for0.0% against17.9% other0.0% against management28 filers81.3% for15.9% against2.7% other16.4% against management219,780 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

129 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.8% for0.0% against17.2% other0.0% against management29 filers65.2% for32.1% against2.7% other32.9% against management219,670 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

391 vote records from 28 filers. 0 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

82.1% for0.0% against17.9% other0.0% against management28 filers85.2% for8.3% against6.4% other11.3% against management667,308 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

3 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management3 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management374 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

31 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4 filers67.8% for32.2% against14.8% against management2,530 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Say-on-pay	3. Auditor
Vanguard	For	No report	For
BlackRock and iShares	Against *	No report	For
Fidelity	Split or no vote	No report	Split or no vote
Dimensional	Against *	No report	For
State Street and SPDR	Against *	No report	For
American Century	Against *	No report	For
Equitable	Split or no vote	No report	Split or no vote
Charles Schwab	Split or no vote	No report	Split or no vote
Nuveen and TIAA	For	No report	For
John Hancock and Manulife	Against *	Against *	For
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	Against *	No report	For
Northern Trust and FlexShares	Against *	For	For
Lincoln Financial	Against *	No report	For
Brighthouse Funds	Against *	No report	For

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Intershop Holding AG meeting?

30 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Mar 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 4 voted against management (75.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Intershop Holding AG on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Intershop Holding AG

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Intershop Holding AG with a meeting date within three days of 27 Mar 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.