Home / Companies / ITC Limited / 11 Aug 2023
ITC Limited: meeting of 11 Aug 2023
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
118 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the ITC Limited meeting of 11 Aug 2023. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
5 nominees; 69.9% of reported votes for; 98 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,030 vote records from 117 filers. 14 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
282 vote records from 117 filers. 5 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONSIssuer
EXTRAORDINARY TRANSACTIONS: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
20 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
202 vote records from 117 filers. 0 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
866 vote records from 117 filers. 0 of the 117 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
366 vote records from 104 filers. 0 of the 104 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
78 vote records from 16 filers. 0 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For |
| Invesco | For | For |
| Equitable | For | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For |
| WisdomTree | For | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | For |
| Thrivent | For | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For |
| Voya | Against * | For |
| First Trust | For | For |
| Russell Investments | For | For |
| Nationwide | For | For |
| Victory Capital | For | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * |
| BNY Mellon | For | For |
| Principal | For | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For |
| MFS | For | For |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * |
| Allspring | Against * | For |
| Virtus | For | For |
| VanEck | For | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For |
| Lord Abbett | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the ITC Limited meeting?
118 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 11 Aug 2023. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by ITC Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for ITC Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing ITC Limited with a meeting date within three days of 11 Aug 2023. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.