Home / Companies / JPMorgan Chase & Co. / 21 May 2024
JPMorgan Chase & Co.: meeting of 21 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
2,199 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the JPMorgan Chase & Co. meeting of 21 May 2024. Their records fall into 15 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 95.6% of reported votes for; 133 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
16,207 vote records from 590 filers. 5 of the 584 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
5,008 vote records from 2,142 filers. 127 of the 2,081 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 61 filers reported this item without a management mark.
3 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on pay tied to a merger or sale
97 vote records from 36 filers. 17 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,607 vote records from 584 filers. 26 of the 578 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,835 vote records from 604 filers. 10 of the 598 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
448 vote records from 37 filers. 17 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Report on due diligence in conflict-affected and high-risk areas
1,492 vote records from 558 filers. 55 of the 553 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Shareholder opportunity to vote on excessive golden parachutes
1,419 vote records from 543 filers. 268 of the 538 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Indigenous peoples' rights indicators
1,463 vote records from 540 filers. 195 of the 535 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Humanitarian risks due to climate change policies
1,412 vote records from 536 filers. 29 of the 532 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Proxy voting alignment
1,409 vote records from 536 filers. 58 of the 531 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Independent board chairman
1,406 vote records from 531 filers. 273 of the 526 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
Report on respecting workforce civil liberties
1,170 vote records from 425 filers. 16 of the 424 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Proposal Withdrawn
244 vote records from 118 filers. 25 of the 115 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
873 vote records from 52 filers. 12 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | Against * | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the JPMorgan Chase & Co. meeting?
2,199 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 127 of 2,081 voted against management (6.1%). 8 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by JPMorgan Chase & Co. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing JPMorgan Chase & Co. with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.