Vote Scores

Home / Companies / LEM Holding SA / 26 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 202527 filers reporting

LEM Holding SA: meeting of 26 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

27 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the LEM Holding SA meeting of 26 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 76.9% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

243 vote records from 20 filers. 3 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

60.0% for15.0% against25.0% other17.6% against management20 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

23 vote records from 11 filers. 7 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

36.4% for63.6% against63.6% against management11 filers27.5% for72.5% against72.5% against management24,771 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

30 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.0% for0.0% against15.0% other0.0% against management20 filers96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management28,157 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

30 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.0% for0.0% against15.0% other0.0% against management20 filers96.8% for0.0% against3.2% other0.0% against management28,157 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

141 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.0% for0.0% against15.0% other0.0% against management20 filers65.5% for31.0% against3.5% other32.1% against management131,431 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

174 vote records from 20 filers. 2 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

70.0% for15.0% against15.0% other11.8% against management20 filers66.2% for25.4% against8.4% other26.7% against management149,096 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

9 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management4 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management9,354 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

12 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other0.0% against management3 filers50.0% for50.0% against50.0% against management8,284 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *For
FidelitySplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
DimensionalAgainst *No reportFor
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeSplit or no voteAgainst *For
J.P. MorganNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
Lincoln FinancialAgainst *No reportFor
Brighthouse FundsAgainst *No reportFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the LEM Holding SA meeting?

27 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 26 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 7 of 11 voted against management (63.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by LEM Holding SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for LEM Holding SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing LEM Holding SA with a meeting date within three days of 26 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 30 Sep 2026.