Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Lifco AB / 24 Apr 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 202496 filers reporting

Lifco AB: meeting of 24 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

96 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Lifco AB meeting of 24 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

10 nominees; 58.1% of reported votes for; 69 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,608 vote records from 85 filers. 8 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

44.7% for9.4% against45.9% other10.8% against management85 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

33 vote records from 21 filers. 3 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

76.2% for14.3% against9.5% other15.0% against management21 filers91.5% for5.6% against2.9% other5.6% against management1,042,682 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

353 vote records from 85 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.9% for0.0% against14.1% other0.0% against management85 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.0% against management58,765,734 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

164 vote records from 85 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

85.9% for0.0% against14.1% other0.0% against management85 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.1% other0.0% against management28,918,174 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

313 vote records from 86 filers. 0 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

76.7% for0.0% against23.3% other0.0% against management86 filers98.7% for1.3% against0.1% other1.2% against management57,598,133 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

3,150 vote records from 85 filers. 0 of the 74 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

85.9% for0.0% against14.1% other0.0% against management85 filers99.7% for0.2% against0.1% other0.2% against management549,707,789 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

359 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

91.7% for0.0% against8.3% other0.0% against management12 filers85.2% for0.8% against13.9% other0.0% against management1,094,244 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportFor
FidelitySplit or no voteNo reportFor
State Street and SPDRSplit or no voteNo reportFor
American CenturySplit or no voteNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonSplit or no voteNo reportFor
InvescoForNo reportFor
EquitableForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *No reportFor
J.P. MorganAgainst *ForFor
WisdomTreeSplit or no voteNo reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesSplit or no voteForFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportFor
ThriventSplit or no voteNo reportFor
Lincoln FinancialSplit or no voteNo reportFor
VoyaSplit or no voteNo reportFor
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportFor
NationwideSplit or no voteNo reportFor
Victory CapitalSplit or no voteNo reportFor
Brighthouse FundsForNo reportFor
BNY MellonSplit or no voteNo reportFor
PrincipalForNo reportFor
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportFor
TransamericaForNo reportFor
Federated HermesAgainst *No reportFor
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *No reportFor
PIMCOAgainst *No reportFor
AllspringSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Lifco AB meeting?

96 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 24 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 20 voted against management (15.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Lifco AB on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Lifco AB

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Lifco AB with a meeting date within three days of 24 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.