Vote Scores

Home / Companies / LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG / 19 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026120 filers reporting

LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG: meeting of 19 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

120 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG meeting of 19 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 85.8% of reported votes for; 11 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

289 vote records from 20 filers. 1 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

90.0% for5.0% against5.0% other5.3% against management20 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

153 vote records from 106 filers. 31 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

58.5% for28.3% against13.2% other32.3% against management106 filers69.7% for26.3% against4.0% other27.6% against management2,904,108 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

60 vote records from 20 filers. 13 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

30.0% for65.0% against5.0% other68.4% against management20 filers28.4% for67.1% against4.5% other70.3% against management8,858,246 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

19 vote records from 16 filers. 1 of the 15 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

87.5% for6.3% against6.3% other6.7% against management16 filers95.2% for0.2% against4.7% other0.2% against management4,222,897 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

120 vote records from 22 filers. 12 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

36.4% for54.5% against9.1% other57.1% against management22 filers40.5% for54.9% against4.6% other57.4% against management21,588,605 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

112 vote records from 20 filers. 1 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

90.0% for5.0% against5.0% other5.3% against management20 filers67.8% for23.2% against9.0% other26.0% against management18,930,538 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

16 vote records from 4 filers. 1 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

25.0% for25.0% against50.0% other25.0% against management4 filers56.0% for44.0% against44.0% against management296,296 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *Against *
State Street and SPDRForNo reportFor
American CenturyForNo reportAgainst *
InvescoForNo reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst *Against *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportAgainst *
WisdomTreeForNo reportAgainst *
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportForNo report
First TrustForNo reportAgainst *
Global XSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
American BeaconForNo reportAgainst *
BairdNo reportAgainst *No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG meeting?

120 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 19 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 31 of 96 voted against management (32.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing LITHIUM ARGENTINA AG with a meeting date within three days of 19 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.