Home / Companies / Loblaw Companies Limited / 12 May 2026
Loblaw Companies Limited: meeting of 12 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
146 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Loblaw Companies Limited meeting of 12 May 2026. Their records fall into 6 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 99.9% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,223 vote records from 94 filers. 0 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
224 vote records from 78 filers. 5 of the 69 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
171 vote records from 94 filers. 0 of the 93 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
122 vote records from 68 filers. 1 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
85 vote records from 5 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Property Controls
169 vote records from 92 filers. 7 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For | Against * |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Loblaw Companies Limited meeting?
146 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 5 of 69 voted against management (7.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Loblaw Companies Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Loblaw Companies Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Loblaw Companies Limited with a meeting date within three days of 12 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.