Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Loblaw Companies Limited

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

Loblaw Companies Limited

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
146year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
7.2%5 of 69 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
not reportedshares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
78.2% for9.0% against12.8% other7.2% against management78 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 146 funds and managers listed Loblaw Companies Limited in their Form N-PX filings (one meeting).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 5 of the 69 filers that reported a position voted against management (7.2%), close to the median company on this site (6.6%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

All 15 of the largest fund families that reported a say-on-pay vote here voted with management.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
12 May 2026year to 30 June 202614667.2%
6 May 2025year to 30 June 2025135117.9%
2 May 2024year to 30 June 2024134613.6%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Loblaw Companies LimitedMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management7.2%6.6%
Reported shares voted against managementwithheld2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 12 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal A
VanguardNo reportAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst
FidelityNo reportAgainst
DimensionalNo reportAgainst
State Street and SPDRNo reportAgainst
American CenturyNo reportAgainst
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainst
InvescoNo reportAgainst
EquitableNo reportFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAANo reportAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportFor *
J.P. MorganForAgainst
Goldman SachsForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor *
SEIForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceNo reportAgainst
ThriventNo reportAgainst
Lincoln FinancialNo reportAgainst
VoyaNo reportAgainst
First TrustNo reportAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForAgainst
NationwideNo reportAgainst
Victory CapitalNo reportAgainst
Brighthouse FundsAgainstAgainst *
BNY MellonNo reportAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportAgainst
Pacific Life fundsNo reportAgainst
TransamericaNo reportAgainst
Federated HermesForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainst
Hartford FundsForAgainst
PIMCONo reportAgainst
Harbor FundsForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 202413613.6%3.8%
year to 30 June 20251377.9%0.4%
year to 30 June 20261467.2%withheld

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS6,43071.9%
AUDIT-RELATED5095.7%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES4745.3%
COMPENSATION4665.2%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE3013.4%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES2983.3%
OTHER2572.9%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE1611.8%
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCE450.5%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Loblaw Companies Limited?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 69 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Loblaw Companies Limited; 5 voted against management (7.2%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Loblaw Companies Limited?

Filers reported one proposal from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 6.5% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Loblaw Companies Limited reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Loblaw Companies Limited, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.