Home / Companies / Loblaw Companies Limited / 6 May 2025
Loblaw Companies Limited: meeting of 6 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
135 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Loblaw Companies Limited meeting of 6 May 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 99.9% of reported votes for; 2 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,112 vote records from 96 filers. 0 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.0% of reported votes for; 6 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
19 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
179 vote records from 67 filers. 5 of the 63 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
165 vote records from 96 filers. 0 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
149 vote records from 69 filers. 0 of the 69 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
162 vote records from 8 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
129 vote records from 77 filers. 6 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal Regarding Food Waste
129 vote records from 77 filers. 14 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Oversee Independent Data Protection Impact Assessment of Healthcare Offerings
129 vote records from 77 filers. 8 of the 77 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal 2 (set out in the Management Proxy Circular).
32 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
45 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For * | For * | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report | For | For * | For * | Against | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Voya | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For * | Against | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | No report | For | For * | For * | Against | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | Against * | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| DWS | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | No report | For | For | No report | No report | No report | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Loblaw Companies Limited meeting?
135 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 5 of 63 voted against management (7.9%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Loblaw Companies Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Loblaw Companies Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Loblaw Companies Limited with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.