Home / Companies / LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE / 18 Apr 2024
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE: meeting of 18 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
405 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE meeting of 18 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 68.6% of reported votes for; 162 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,860 vote records from 335 filers. 123 of the 333 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
362 vote records from 108 filers. 53 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
185 vote records from 46 filers. 1 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,352 vote records from 335 filers. 0 of the 333 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
6,135 vote records from 338 filers. 216 of the 335 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,917 vote records from 298 filers. 1 of the 296 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,037 vote records from 280 filers. 0 of the 278 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | Against * | Split or no vote |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | No report |
| American Century | Against * | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | Against * | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | Against * | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report |
| Voya | Against * | No report | No report |
| First Trust | Against * | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against * | Split or no vote |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | Against * | No report | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| MFS | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| DWS | Against * | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report | No report |
| Allspring | Against * | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against * | No report |
| Virtus | For | No report | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against * | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | Split or no vote |
| American Beacon | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | No report |
| Lord Abbett | Against * | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | Split or no vote | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE meeting?
405 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 53 of 102 voted against management (52.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE with a meeting date within three days of 18 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.