Vote Scores

Home / Companies / LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE / 23 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026336 filers reporting

LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE: meeting of 23 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

336 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE meeting of 23 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

6 nominees; 66.4% of reported votes for; 210 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

3,370 vote records from 277 filers. 71 of the 276 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

66.8% for25.6% against7.6% other25.7% against management277 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

447 vote records from 108 filers. 61 of the 103 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.

37.0% for55.6% against7.4% other59.2% against management108 filers37.7% for61.9% against0.4% other62.2% against management65,975,546 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

107 vote records from 50 filers. 39 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

16.0% for82.0% against2.0% other79.6% against management50 filers1.0% for99.0% against98.8% against management6,995,319 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,906 vote records from 277 filers. 0 of the 276 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

99.6% for0.0% against0.4% other0.0% against management277 filers92.8% for7.2% against7.2% against management116,385,694 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

4,104 vote records from 279 filers. 122 of the 278 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

43.0% for44.4% against12.5% other43.9% against management279 filers69.8% for30.2% against30.1% against management269,591,802 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

2,531 vote records from 277 filers. 132 of the 276 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

40.4% for48.0% against11.6% other47.8% against management277 filers52.7% for47.2% against0.0% other47.2% against management171,457,145 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

453 vote records from 36 filers. 0 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.4% for0.0% against5.6% other0.0% against management36 filers79.4% for20.6% against20.0% against management4,568,538 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

16 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers87.5% for12.5% against0.0% against management400,048 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForNo reportAgainst *
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainst *Against *
FidelityForNo reportAgainst *
DimensionalAgainst *No reportNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportNo report
American CenturyAgainst *No reportNo report
Franklin TempletonAgainst *No reportNo report
InvescoForNo reportNo report
EquitableForNo reportFor
Charles SchwabForNo reportAgainst *
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *Against *No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportAgainst *
J.P. MorganForForNo report
Goldman SachsForNo reportNo report
WisdomTreeAgainst *No reportNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainst *No report
SEIForNo reportAgainst *
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportNo report
ThriventAgainst *No reportNo report
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *Against *
VoyaAgainst *No reportNo report
First TrustAgainst *No reportNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportAgainst *
NationwideAgainst *No reportNo report
Victory CapitalAgainst *No reportNo report
Brighthouse FundsForAgainstAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForNo reportNo report
BNY MellonForNo reportNo report
PrincipalForNo reportNo report
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportNo report
Global XForNo reportAgainst *
MFSForNo reportNo report
TransamericaAgainst *ForNo report
Federated HermesSplit or no voteNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *No reportNo report
Hartford FundsForNo reportAgainst *
DWSAgainst *No reportNo report
PIMCOAgainst *No reportNo report
AllspringAgainst *No reportNo report
MassMutualForAgainst *No report
Harbor FundsForAgainst *No report
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonAgainst *No reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForNo reportAgainst *
American BeaconForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo reportNo report
Lord AbbettAgainst *No reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE meeting?

336 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 61 of 103 voted against management (59.2%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.