Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Mastercard Incorporated / 18 Jun 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 20242,113 filers reporting

Mastercard Incorporated: meeting of 18 Jun 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

2,113 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mastercard Incorporated meeting of 18 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 95.7% of reported votes for; 105 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

19,099 vote records from 566 filers. 7 of the 562 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

97.7% for1.1% against1.2% other1.2% against management566 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

4,387 vote records from 2,064 filers. 97 of the 2,016 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 48 filers reported this item without a management mark.

3 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

92.2% for4.5% against3.3% other4.8% against management2,064 filers
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,586 vote records from 562 filers. 23 of the 558 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

94.8% for4.1% against1.1% other4.1% against management562 filers
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

127 vote records from 44 filers. 3 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

84.1% for6.8% against9.1% other7.0% against management44 filers99.1% for0.8% against0.1% other0.8% against management1,630,106 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder

Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting a congruency report on privacy and human rights

3,038 vote records from 540 filers. 32 of the 538 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

1.5% for94.3% against4.3% other5.9% against management540 filers
6

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting a report on gender-based compensation and benefit gaps

1,518 vote records from 539 filers. 34 of the 536 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

2.0% for94.6% against3.3% other6.3% against management539 filers
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting transparency in lobbying. 5.consideration of a...

1,515 vote records from 536 filers. 129 of the 532 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

23.3% for75.9% against0.7% other24.2% against management536 filers
8

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Consideration of a stockholder proposal requesting transparency in lobbying

1,417 vote records from 512 filers. 177 of the 509 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

30.5% for66.4% against3.1% other34.8% against management512 filers
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

222 vote records from 55 filers. 12 of the 55 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

20.0% for74.5% against5.5% other21.8% against management55 filers1.8% for98.1% against0.1% other1.5% against management26,552,724 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor5. Proposal6. Proposal7. Proposal8. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
FidelityForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
SEIForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
First TrustForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
NationwideForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BNY MellonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Global XForForForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
MFSForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Federated HermesForForForSplit or no voteAgainstFor *Against
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
DWSForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
PIMCOForForAgainst *AgainstAgainstFor *For *
AllspringForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
MassMutualForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
VirtusForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
VanEckForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
American BeaconForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Lord AbbettForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Cohen & SteersNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
Artisan PartnersForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Mastercard Incorporated meeting?

2,113 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 97 of 2,016 voted against management (4.8%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mastercard Incorporated on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Mastercard Incorporated

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mastercard Incorporated with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.