Home / Companies / Metro Inc. / 27 Jan 2026
Metro Inc.: meeting of 27 Jan 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
122 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Metro Inc. meeting of 27 Jan 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 98.2% of reported votes for; 5 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,496 vote records from 73 filers. 1 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
192 vote records from 69 filers. 3 of the 60 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
137 vote records from 73 filers. 2 of the 73 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
94 vote records from 53 filers. 0 of the 53 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
125 vote records from 8 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED
112 vote records from 64 filers. 3 of the 64 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Increased Participation in Annual General Meetings
127 vote records from 70 filers. 3 of the 70 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
33 vote records from 11 filers. 1 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | Abstain or withhold * | For * | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | No report | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For | Against * | Against * |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Metro Inc. meeting?
122 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Jan 2026. On say-on-pay, 3 of 60 voted against management (5.0%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Metro Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Metro Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Metro Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 27 Jan 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.