Home / Companies / Mondelez International, Inc. / 22 May 2024
Mondelez International, Inc.: meeting of 22 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,664 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Mondelez International, Inc. meeting of 22 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 96.4% of reported votes for; 45 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
11,825 vote records from 397 filers. 4 of the 393 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
2,803 vote records from 1,625 filers. 90 of the 1,573 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 52 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,069 vote records from 393 filers. 15 of the 389 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,157 vote records from 411 filers. 14 of the 406 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting an Audit Committee subcommittee study on Company affiliations;
1,012 vote records from 382 filers. 21 of the 380 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting Board adopt targets and publicly report quantitative metrics to eradicate...
1,009 vote records from 382 filers. 96 of the 379 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
S/h proposal - establish independent chairman
958 vote records from 368 filers. 112 of the 364 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal requesting third-party report assessing effectiveness of implementation of human...
712 vote records from 272 filers. 112 of the 271 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
415 vote records from 132 filers. 41 of the 131 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | For * | For * | For * |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | Against * | Against | For * | For * | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against | No report |
| Lord Abbett | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Mondelez International, Inc. meeting?
1,664 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 90 of 1,573 voted against management (5.7%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Mondelez International, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Mondelez International, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Mondelez International, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 22 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.