Vote Scores

Home / Companies / National Australia Bank Limited

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXname as filed

National Australia Bank Limited

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
146year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
4.5%2 of 44 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
2.7%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
91.3% for4.3% against4.3% other4.5% against management46 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

146 Form N-PX filers reported votes at National Australia Bank Limited for the year to 30 June 2026, across one meeting.

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 2 of the 44 filers that reported a position voted against management (4.5%), 2.0 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 2.7% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

All 6 of the largest fund families that reported a say-on-pay vote here voted with management.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
12 Dec 2025year to 30 June 2026145114.5%
18 Dec 2024year to 30 June 202514195.6%
15 Dec 2023year to 30 June 202413690.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026National Australia Bank LimitedMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management4.5%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management2.7%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 12 Dec 2025: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal C
VanguardNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainst
FidelityNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
DimensionalNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
State Street and SPDRNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
American CenturyNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
InvescoNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
EquitableNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Nuveen and TIAANo reportFor *AgainstAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportAgainstAgainstAbstain or withhold *
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Goldman SachsNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstAgainstAgainst
T. Rowe PriceNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
ThriventNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Lincoln FinancialNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
VoyaNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
First TrustNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
NationwideNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Victory CapitalNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Brighthouse FundsNo reportAgainst *Against *Against *
BNY MellonNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
Pacific Life fundsNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
TransamericaNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
PIMCONo reportAgainstAgainstAgainst
MassMutualForNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20241360.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 20251415.6%0.5%
year to 30 June 20261464.5%2.7%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS2,02333.5%
COMPENSATION1,79629.7%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE84814.0%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE80313.3%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES2834.7%
OTHER1833.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE1101.8%

Questions

How did large funds vote at National Australia Bank Limited?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 44 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at National Australia Bank Limited; 2 voted against management (4.5%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at National Australia Bank Limited?

Filers reported 3 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 3.9% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which National Australia Bank Limited reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list National Australia Bank Limited, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.