Vote Scores

Home / Companies / NVIDIA Corporation

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXNVDA · SEC company no. 1045810

NVIDIA Corporation

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
2,705year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
4.9%126 of 2,582 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
3.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
9across 3 seasons
91.8% for4.8% against3.5% other4.9% against management2,655 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,705 funds and managers listed NVIDIA Corporation in their Form N-PX filings (4 meetings).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 126 of the 2,582 filers that reported a position voted against management (4.9%), 1.7 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 3.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
24 Jun 2026year to 30 June 20262,68484.9%
18 Jun 2026year to 30 June 2026410.0%
27 Apr 2026year to 30 June 20264225.0%
25 Jun 2025year to 30 June 20252,532108.5%
28 Apr 2025year to 30 June 2025310.0%
26 Jun 2024year to 30 June 20242,31166.4%
18 Jun 2024year to 30 June 2024310.0%
29 Apr 2024year to 30 June 2024320.0%
22 Jun 2023year to 30 June 2024410.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026NVIDIA CorporationMedian company
Reporting filers voting against management4.9%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management3.8%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 24 Jun 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal BProposal CProposal D
VanguardForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
FidelityForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
DimensionalForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
State Street and SPDRForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
American CenturyForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Franklin TempletonForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
InvescoForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
EquitableForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Charles SchwabForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
J.P. MorganForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Goldman SachsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Jackson National fundsForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor *AgainstFor *Against
SEIForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
ThriventForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
VoyaForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
First TrustForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Russell InvestmentsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
NationwideForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Victory CapitalForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Brighthouse FundsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Capital Group and American FundsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Global XForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
MFSForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
TransamericaForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Federated HermesForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
AllianceBernsteinForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Hartford FundsForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
DWSForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
PIMCOForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
AllspringForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
MassMutualForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Harbor FundsForFor *AgainstFor *Against
VirtusForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
VanEckForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForFor *AgainstFor *Against
Janus HendersonForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Neuberger BermanForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
American BeaconForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Lord AbbettForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Dodge & CoxForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdForAgainstAgainstFor *Against
Artisan PartnersForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242,3226.4%6.8%
year to 30 June 20252,5708.5%6.2%
year to 30 June 20262,7054.9%3.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS77,11764.2%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES16,04513.4%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE10,5378.8%
AUDIT-RELATED6,4565.4%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION4,3983.7%
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE2,2351.9%
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES2,2211.8%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES7910.7%
COMPENSATION2640.2%

Questions

How did large funds vote at NVIDIA Corporation?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 2,582 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at NVIDIA Corporation; 126 voted against management (4.9%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at NVIDIA Corporation?

Filers reported 4 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 1.2% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which NVIDIA Corporation reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list NVIDIA Corporation, grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.