Vote Scores

Home / Companies / O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. / 15 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,391 filers reporting

O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.: meeting of 15 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,391 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. meeting of 15 May 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 94.2% of reported votes for; 87 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

8,038 vote records from 357 filers. 3 of the 353 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.0% for0.8% against1.1% other0.8% against management357 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,236 vote records from 1,372 filers. 101 of the 1,338 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 34 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.5% for7.1% against3.4% other7.5% against management1,372 filers93.1% for6.7% against0.2% other6.7% against management50,581,504 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

895 vote records from 355 filers. 7 of the 352 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.5% for1.7% against0.8% other2.0% against management355 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% other0.2% against management18,137,368 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

839 vote records from 333 filers. 4 of the 330 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.2% for1.2% against0.6% other1.2% against management333 filers99.6% for0.4% against0.0% other0.4% against management16,540,142 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

67 vote records from 25 filers. 2 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

64.0% for32.0% against4.0% other8.0% against management25 filers62.6% for37.4% against8.3% against management188,986 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

54 vote records from 22 filers. 1 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

86.4% for0.0% against13.6% other4.8% against management22 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% against management1,597,686 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal entitled "Support Improved Clawback Policy for Unearned Executive Pay."

860 vote records from 344 filers. 23 of the 341 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

6.4% for92.7% against0.9% other6.7% against management344 filers1.1% for98.8% against0.0% other1.3% against management18,049,109 reported shares
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management2 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management327 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor7. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainst
InvescoForForForAgainst
EquitableForForForAgainst
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainst
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForAgainst
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForAgainst
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForAgainst
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainst
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForAgainst
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainst
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainst
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainst
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForNo report
MFSForForForAgainst
TransamericaForForForAgainst
Federated HermesForForForAgainst
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainst
Hartford FundsForForForAgainst
DWSForForForAgainst
PIMCOForForForAgainst
AllspringForForForAgainst
MassMutualForForForAgainst
Harbor FundsForForForAgainst
VirtusForForForAgainst
VanEckForForForAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForForForAgainst
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainst
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainst
Lord AbbettForForForAgainst
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. meeting?

1,391 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 101 of 1,338 voted against management (7.5%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for O'Reilly Automotive, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing O'Reilly Automotive, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 15 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.