Home / Companies / Open Text Corporation / 12 Sep 2024
Open Text Corporation: meeting of 12 Sep 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
255 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Open Text Corporation meeting of 12 Sep 2024. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
11 nominees; 90.0% of reported votes for; 80 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,943 vote records from 111 filers. 0 of the 110 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
314 vote records from 177 filers. 76 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
182 vote records from 111 filers. 1 of the 110 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
25 vote records from 20 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
287 vote records from 97 filers. 1 of the 96 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
24 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | Against * | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | For | Against * | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | Against * | For |
| Russell Investments | For | Against * | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | Against * | Abstain or withhold * |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | Against * | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against * | For |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Open Text Corporation meeting?
255 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 Sep 2024. On say-on-pay, 76 of 170 voted against management (44.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Open Text Corporation on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Open Text Corporation
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Open Text Corporation with a meeting date within three days of 12 Sep 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.