Home / Companies / Orange SA / 21 May 2025
Orange SA: meeting of 21 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
191 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Orange SA meeting of 21 May 2025. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 94.3% of reported votes for; 14 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
765 vote records from 163 filers. 0 of the 162 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
237 vote records from 46 filers. 0 of the 42 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
83 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3,553 vote records from 163 filers. 0 of the 162 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,401 vote records from 165 filers. 0 of the 164 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,095 vote records from 163 filers. 0 of the 162 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
220 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Amending Item 24 of Current Meeting to either Align the Employees' Free Shares Plans to the Executives'...
253 vote records from 134 filers. 2 of the 133 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
252 vote records from 133 filers. 2 of the 132 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
72 vote records from 18 filers. 1 of the 18 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | No report | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | No report | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | No report | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | Split or no vote | No report | For | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | Split or no vote | For | No report | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Allspring | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | No report | No report | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Orange SA meeting?
191 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 0 of 42 voted against management (0.0%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Orange SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Orange SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Orange SA with a meeting date within three days of 21 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.