Home / Companies / PEPSICO, INC. / 6 May 2026
PEPSICO, INC.: meeting of 6 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
2,026 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the PEPSICO, INC. meeting of 6 May 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 95.4% of reported votes for; 57 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
17,995 vote records from 460 filers. 3 of the 458 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4,348 vote records from 2,009 filers. 109 of the 1,949 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 60 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,385 vote records from 458 filers. 17 of the 456 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
77 vote records from 25 filers. 1 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
HUMAN RIGHTS OR HUMAN CAPITAL/WORKFORCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal - Report on Human Rights Oversight.
1,341 vote records from 438 filers. 56 of the 435 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal - Independent Board Chair.
1,309 vote records from 437 filers. 125 of the 434 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal - Report Evaluating the Treatment of Animals within Supply Chain.
1,308 vote records from 437 filers. 42 of the 434 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
91 vote records from 14 filers. 6 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 5. Proposal | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For | For | For * | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against * | Against * | Against * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | For * | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | Against | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| VanEck | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | For * | Against |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Cohen & Steers | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the PEPSICO, INC. meeting?
2,026 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 109 of 1,949 voted against management (5.6%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by PEPSICO, INC. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for PEPSICO, INC.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing PEPSICO, INC. with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.