Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Pernod Ricard SA / 27 Oct 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026220 filers reporting

Pernod Ricard SA: meeting of 27 Oct 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

220 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Pernod Ricard SA meeting of 27 Oct 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

5 nominees; 96.4% of reported votes for; 24 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

1,705 vote records from 182 filers. 1 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.5% for0.5% against4.9% other0.6% against management182 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

280 vote records from 68 filers. 7 of the 52 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

64.7% for8.8% against26.5% other13.5% against management68 filers96.5% for3.3% against0.3% other3.5% against management34,337,210 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

62 vote records from 33 filers. 0 of the 33 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management33 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management12,703,303 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

3,112 vote records from 182 filers. 0 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.1% for0.0% against4.9% other0.0% against management182 filers98.9% for1.1% against1.1% against management521,880,719 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,876 vote records from 182 filers. 0 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.1% for0.0% against4.9% other0.0% against management182 filers96.0% for4.0% against4.0% against management324,946,032 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,516 vote records from 182 filers. 0 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.1% for0.0% against4.9% other0.0% against management182 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management263,742,818 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

219 vote records from 21 filers. 0 of the 11 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.

52.4% for0.0% against47.6% other0.0% against management21 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management12,023,048 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

20 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management1 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2,252,080 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForNo reportFor
DimensionalForNo reportNo report
State Street and SPDRForNo reportNo report
American CenturyForNo reportNo report
Franklin TempletonForNo reportNo report
InvescoForNo reportNo report
EquitableForNo reportNo report
Charles SchwabForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAForNo reportNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForForNo report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForNo reportNo report
J.P. MorganForForNo report
Goldman SachsForNo reportNo report
WisdomTreeForNo reportNo report
PGIM and PrudentialForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsForForNo report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForNo report
SEIForNo reportFor
T. Rowe PriceForNo reportNo report
ThriventForNo reportNo report
Lincoln FinancialForNo reportNo report
VoyaForNo reportNo report
First TrustForNo reportNo report
Russell InvestmentsForNo reportFor
NationwideForNo reportNo report
Victory CapitalForNo reportNo report
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
BNY MellonForNo reportNo report
PrincipalForNo reportNo report
Capital Group and American FundsForNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForNo reportNo report
MFSForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForNo report
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *No reportNo report
Hartford FundsForNo reportFor
DWSForNo reportNo report
PIMCOForNo reportNo report
MassMutualForNo reportNo report
VanEckForNo reportFor
Janus HendersonForNo reportNo report
American BeaconForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForNo reportNo report
Lord AbbettForNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportSplit or no voteNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Pernod Ricard SA meeting?

220 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 27 Oct 2025. On say-on-pay, 7 of 52 voted against management (13.5%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Pernod Ricard SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Pernod Ricard SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Pernod Ricard SA with a meeting date within three days of 27 Oct 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.