Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Pfizer Inc. / 25 Apr 2024

Meeting · year to 30 June 20241,896 filers reporting

Pfizer Inc.: meeting of 25 Apr 2024

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,896 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Pfizer Inc. meeting of 25 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

12 nominees; 96.3% of reported votes for; 44 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

13,317 vote records from 438 filers. 4 of the 434 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

97.7% for0.7% against1.6% other0.9% against management438 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

3,308 vote records from 1,832 filers. 175 of the 1,767 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 65 filers reported this item without a management mark.

10 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided

86.2% for9.4% against4.4% other9.9% against management1,832 filers94.7% for5.3% against0.1% other5.3% against management7,418,402,746 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,109 vote records from 432 filers. 15 of the 428 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

95.4% for3.2% against1.4% other3.5% against management432 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management1,600,218,344 reported shares
4

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,226 vote records from 456 filers. 44 of the 450 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided

86.2% for9.0% against4.8% other9.8% against management456 filers
5

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

101 vote records from 25 filers. 12 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

60.0% for16.0% against24.0% other54.5% against management25 filers97.0% for2.0% against1.0% other95.7% against management10,436,377 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

122 vote records from 27 filers. 7 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

63.0% for22.2% against14.8% other26.9% against management27 filers12.1% for78.1% against9.9% other11.7% against management11,122,913 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Publish a Report on Corporate Contributions

946 vote records from 396 filers. 28 of the 394 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

1.8% for93.7% against4.5% other7.1% against management396 filers0.0% for99.1% against0.8% other1.0% against management1,430,038,424 reported shares
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Adopt an Independent Board Chair Policy

1,015 vote records from 410 filers. 145 of the 407 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

34.1% for65.1% against0.7% other35.6% against management410 filers28.2% for71.8% against0.0% other28.4% against management1,588,535,598 reported shares
9

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder

Publish a Congruency Report on Political, Lobbying, Electioneering Expenditures

947 vote records from 395 filers. 73 of the 393 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided

13.4% for82.0% against4.6% other18.6% against management395 filers2.2% for96.9% against0.8% other3.2% against management1,430,100,014 reported shares
10

SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES

363 vote records from 160 filers. 95 of the 145 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 15 filers reported this item without a management mark.

13.1% for30.6% against56.3% other65.5% against management160 filers3.2% for51.3% against45.5% other47.6% against management375,975,662 reported shares
11

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

334 vote records from 35 filers. 7 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

11.4% for77.1% against11.4% other20.0% against management35 filers0.8% for99.1% against0.1% other1.6% against management322,865,348 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor7. Proposal8. Proposal9. Proposal10. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForNo reportAgainstNo reportSplit or no vote
FidelityForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAbstain or withhold *
DimensionalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
American CenturyForAgainst *ForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Franklin TempletonForForForAgainstFor *For *Against
InvescoForForForAgainstFor *AgainstNo report
EquitableForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Charles SchwabForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAbstain or withhold *
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
ProShares and ProFundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAbstain or withhold *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForAgainst *ForAgainstFor *For *No report
J.P. MorganForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAbstain or withhold *
Goldman SachsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainstFor *AgainstSplit or no vote
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainst *ForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAbstain or withhold *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
SEIForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAbstain or withhold *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
ThriventForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstSplit or no vote *
VoyaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
First TrustForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Russell InvestmentsForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAbstain or withhold *
NationwideForForForAgainstFor *For *No report
Victory CapitalForForForAgainstFor *For *Against
Brighthouse FundsForForForAgainstAgainst *AgainstSplit or no vote
Guggenheim and RydexForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForAgainstFor *AgainstNo report
BNY MellonForForForAgainstFor *AgainstNo report
PrincipalForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAgainst
Capital Group and American FundsForForForAgainstFor *AgainstNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Global XForForForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
MFSForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
TransamericaForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Federated HermesForForForAgainstFor *AgainstFor *
AllianceBernsteinForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Hartford FundsForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAgainst
DWSForForForAgainstAgainstFor *No report
PIMCOForAgainst *Against *AgainstFor *For *No report
AllspringForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
MassMutualForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Harbor FundsForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstFor *
VirtusForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
VanEckForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAbstain or withhold *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForAgainstAgainstFor *For *
Janus HendersonForForForAgainstFor *AgainstNo report
Neuberger BermanForForForAgainstFor *AgainstAbstain or withhold *
American BeaconForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForAgainstAgainstAgainstAbstain or withhold *
Lord AbbettNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo reportNo reportNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Pfizer Inc. meeting?

1,896 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 175 of 1,767 voted against management (9.9%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Pfizer Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Pfizer Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Pfizer Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 25 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.