Home / Companies / Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA / 25 Jun 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025119 filers reporting

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA: meeting of 25 Jun 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

119 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA meeting of 25 Jun 2025. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 47.3% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

237 vote records from 14 filers. 11 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

78.6% for7.1% against14.3% other84.6% against management14 filers

2

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 75 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

241 vote records from 77 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 77 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for97.4% against2.6% other77 filers

3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

59 vote records from 25 filers. 22 of the 24 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

8.0% for88.0% against4.0% other91.7% against management25 filers5.1% for94.9% against94.9% against management21,362,722 reported shares

4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

176 vote records from 104 filers. 0 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.0% against management104 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management62,848,295 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

161 vote records from 94 filers. 69 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

21.3% for74.5% against4.3% other75.0% against management94 filers28.2% for69.3% against2.6% other69.9% against management62,442,489 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

6,393 vote records from 104 filers. 2 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.2% for0.0% against3.8% other2.0% against management104 filers91.8% for4.9% against3.4% other4.7% against management2,226,204,431 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

7

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONIssuer

DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

18 vote records from 16 filers. 0 of the 16 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management16 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management5,996,846 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

504 vote records from 80 filers. 0 of the 78 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.8% for0.0% against6.3% other0.0% against management80 filers84.3% for2.5% against13.2% other14.1% against management74,038,283 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

9

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Amend Feb. 8, 2017, EGM, Resolution Re: Remuneration Policy for Members of Management Board

287 vote records from 101 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 99 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for86.1% against13.9% other0.0% against management101 filers0.0% for95.1% against4.9% other0.0% against management103,991,061 reported shares

10

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Approve Collective Suitability Assessment of Supervisory Board Members

108 vote records from 66 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 65 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for97.0% against3.0% other0.0% against management66 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management37,259,631 reported shares

11

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

40 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 27 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for89.7% against10.3% other0.0% against management29 filers0.0% for97.3% against2.7% other0.0% against management8,086,827 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Directors	3. Say-on-pay	9. Proposal	10. Proposal
Vanguard	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
BlackRock and iShares	For *	Against	No report	Against	No report
Fidelity	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
State Street and SPDR	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
American Century	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Franklin Templeton	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Equitable	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Charles Schwab	No report	No report	No report	Abstain or withhold	No report
Nuveen and TIAA	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
John Hancock and Manulife	No report	No report	Against *	Against	No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
J.P. Morgan	No report	No report	Against *	Against	No report
WisdomTree	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
PGIM and Prudential	No report	No report	No report	Abstain or withhold	No report
Jackson National funds	No report	No report	Against *	Against	No report
Northern Trust and FlexShares	No report	Against	Against *	Against	Against
SEI	No report	No report	No report	Abstain or withhold	No report
T. Rowe Price	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Thrivent	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Lincoln Financial	For *	Against	No report	Against	Against
Voya	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
First Trust	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Russell Investments	No report	No report	No report	Against	No report
Nationwide	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Victory Capital	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Columbia Threadneedle	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
BNY Mellon	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Pacific Life funds	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
Federated Hermes	No report	No report	No report	Abstain or withhold	No report
Hartford Funds	No report	No report	No report	Against	No report
PIMCO	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against
MassMutual	No report	Against	Against *	Against	Against
Lord Abbett	No report	Against	No report	Against	Against

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA meeting?

119 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Jun 2025. On say-on-pay, 22 of 24 voted against management (91.7%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA with a meeting date within three days of 25 Jun 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.