Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA / 18 Jun 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026125 filers reporting

Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA: meeting of 18 Jun 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

125 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA meeting of 18 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

25 nominees; 89.7% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

582 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

83.3% for16.7% against0.0% against management12 filers
2

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 0.0% of reported votes for; 81 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

266 vote records from 87 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 87 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for90.8% against9.2% other87 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

104 vote records from 38 filers. 31 of the 34 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

7.9% for81.6% against10.5% other91.2% against management38 filers2.2% for97.8% against97.8% against management52,947,001 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

181 vote records from 109 filers. 0 of the 101 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.6% for0.0% against6.4% other0.0% against management109 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management59,555,159 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

157 vote records from 92 filers. 72 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.

8.7% for84.8% against6.5% other88.9% against management92 filers2.2% for97.8% against96.7% against management53,837,881 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

7,099 vote records from 110 filers. 0 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.6% for0.0% against6.4% other0.0% against management110 filers97.9% for1.4% against0.6% other1.7% against management2,100,391,939 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

194 vote records from 18 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.

44.4% for0.0% against55.6% other0.0% against management18 filers64.0% for0.0% against36.0% other0.0% against management9,466,929 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

COMPENSATIONSecurity holder

Shareholder Proposal Regarding Amendment to Management Remuneration Policy

154 vote records from 87 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 87 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for90.8% against9.2% other87 filers0.0% for99.5% against0.5% other43,511,328 reported shares

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Directors3. Say-on-pay8. Proposal
VanguardNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForNo reportAgainst *No report
FidelityNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
State Street and SPDRNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
American CenturyNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Franklin TempletonNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
InvescoNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
EquitableNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Charles SchwabNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Nuveen and TIAANo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
John Hancock and ManulifeNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
J.P. MorganNo reportAgainstAgainst *Against
Goldman SachsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
WisdomTreeNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Jackson National fundsNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
Northern Trust and FlexSharesNo reportAgainstAgainst *Against
SEINo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
T. Rowe PriceNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Lincoln FinancialForAgainstAgainst *Against
VoyaNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
First TrustNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Russell InvestmentsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
NationwideNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Columbia ThreadneedleNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
BNY MellonNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Pacific Life fundsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Global XNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
MFSNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Federated HermesNo reportAbstain or withholdNo reportSplit or no vote
AllianceBernsteinNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
PIMCONo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
MassMutualNo reportNo reportAgainst *No report
VirtusNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst
Macquarie and Delaware FundsNo reportAgainstNo reportAgainst

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA meeting?

125 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 18 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 31 of 34 voted against management (91.2%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Powszechny Zaklad Ubezpieczen SA with a meeting date within three days of 18 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.