Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Prudential Financial, Inc. / 13 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 20251,311 filers reporting

Prudential Financial, Inc.: meeting of 13 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,311 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Prudential Financial, Inc. meeting of 13 May 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 96.4% of reported votes for; 33 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

6,590 vote records from 291 filers. 5 of the 289 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.9% for1.4% against1.7% other1.7% against management291 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

1,927 vote records from 1,279 filers. 90 of the 1,240 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 39 filers reported this item without a management mark.

89.4% for6.9% against3.8% other7.3% against management1,279 filers94.0% for5.9% against0.1% other6.1% against management174,488,421 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

773 vote records from 290 filers. 8 of the 288 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.9% for2.8% against1.4% other2.8% against management290 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other0.1% against management176,125,739 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

235 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management29 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management242,965,405 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

81 vote records from 43 filers. 1 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

95.3% for0.0% against4.7% other2.3% against management43 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management56,352,684 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

115 vote records from 38 filers. 5 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

84.2% for13.2% against2.6% other13.5% against management38 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.1% against management97,332,370 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer

OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

47 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management29 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management48,593,081 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal regarding an Independent Board Chairman.

649 vote records from 250 filers. 139 of the 248 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

56.0% for42.8% against1.2% other56.0% against management250 filers11.0% for89.0% against0.0% other11.1% against management78,734,200 reported shares
9

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management1 filers0.0% for100.0% against0.0% against management140 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor8. Proposal
VanguardForForForAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForForForAgainst
FidelityForForForAgainst
DimensionalForForForAgainst
State Street and SPDRForForForAgainst
American CenturyForForForAgainst
Franklin TempletonForForForFor *
InvescoForForForFor *
EquitableForAgainst *ForFor *
Charles SchwabForForForAgainst
Nuveen and TIAAForForForAgainst
ProShares and ProFundsForForForFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForForForFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForForFor *
J.P. MorganForForForAgainst
Goldman SachsForForForAgainst
WisdomTreeForForForAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForForForFor *
Jackson National fundsForForForAgainst
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForForAgainst
SEIForForForFor *
T. Rowe PriceForForForAgainst
ThriventForForForFor *
Lincoln FinancialForForForAgainst
VoyaForForForAgainst
First TrustForForForFor *
Russell InvestmentsForForForFor *
NationwideForForForAgainst
Victory CapitalForForForFor *
Brighthouse FundsForForForFor *
Guggenheim and RydexForForForFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForForForFor *
BNY MellonForForForAgainst
PrincipalForForForFor *
Capital Group and American FundsNo reportSplit or no voteNo reportNo report
Pacific Life fundsForForForAgainst
Global XForForForNo report
MFSNo reportForNo reportNo report
TransamericaForForForFor *
Federated HermesForForForFor *
AllianceBernsteinForAgainst *ForFor *
Hartford FundsForForForFor *
DWSForForForFor *
PIMCOForForForFor *
AllspringForForForFor *
MassMutualForForForAgainst
VirtusForForForFor *
VanEckForForForFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForForFor *
Janus HendersonForForForFor *
Neuberger BermanNo reportForNo reportNo report
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForForFor *
Harris Associates and OakmarkNo reportForNo reportNo report
BairdNo reportForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Prudential Financial, Inc. meeting?

1,311 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 13 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 90 of 1,240 voted against management (7.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Prudential Financial, Inc. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Prudential Financial, Inc.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Prudential Financial, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 13 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.