Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Raiffeisen Bank International AG / 9 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 2026127 filers reporting

Raiffeisen Bank International AG: meeting of 9 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

127 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Raiffeisen Bank International AG meeting of 9 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 18.2% of reported votes for; 76 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

557 vote records from 108 filers. 72 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

14.8% for69.4% against15.7% other78.3% against management108 filers
2

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

1 nominee; 33.3% of reported votes for; 41 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

116 vote records from 67 filers. 38 of the 66 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

37.3% for61.2% against1.5% other57.6% against management67 filers
3

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

143 vote records from 45 filers. 1 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.

60.0% for2.2% against37.8% other3.6% against management45 filers99.0% for1.0% against1.0% against management2,726,435 reported shares
4

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

212 vote records from 108 filers. 0 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.2% for0.0% against14.8% other0.0% against management108 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management9,082,531 reported shares
5

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

635 vote records from 108 filers. 0 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.2% for0.0% against14.8% other0.0% against management108 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management27,219,823 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

149 vote records from 84 filers. 0 of the 80 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

95.2% for0.0% against4.8% other0.0% against management84 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management8,173,636 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

360 vote records from 97 filers. 0 of the 91 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.8% for0.0% against6.2% other0.0% against management97 filers97.8% for0.0% against2.2% other0.0% against management17,988,431 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

78 vote records from 8 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 8 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for0.0% against100.0% other8 filers

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Directors3. Say-on-pay4. Auditor
VanguardAgainst *Against *No reportFor
BlackRock and iSharesSplit or no voteNo reportForSplit or no vote
FidelityForForNo reportFor
DimensionalSplit or no voteSplit or no voteNo reportSplit or no vote
State Street and SPDRAgainst *Against *No reportFor
American CenturyAgainst *ForNo reportFor
Franklin TempletonAgainst *Against *No reportFor
InvescoForForNo reportFor
EquitableAgainst *No reportNo reportFor
Charles SchwabAgainst *ForNo reportFor
Nuveen and TIAAAgainst *Against *No reportFor
John Hancock and ManulifeAgainst *No reportForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertAgainst *Against *No reportFor
J.P. MorganAgainst *No reportForFor
Goldman SachsForForNo reportFor
WisdomTreeAgainst *Against *No reportFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForNo reportFor
Jackson National fundsAgainst *No reportForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForNo reportForFor
SEIAgainst *ForNo reportFor
T. Rowe PriceAgainst *No reportNo reportFor
ThriventAgainst *Against *No reportFor
Lincoln FinancialAgainstAgainstSplit or no voteFor
VoyaAgainst *Against *No reportFor
First TrustAgainst *Against *No reportFor
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *ForNo reportFor
NationwideAgainst *ForNo reportFor
Victory CapitalAgainst *Against *No reportFor
Brighthouse FundsAgainstAgainstNo reportFor
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *Against *No reportFor
BNY MellonAgainst *ForNo reportFor
PrincipalAgainst *Against *No reportFor
Global XAgainst *ForNo reportFor
MFSAgainst *Against *No reportFor
TransamericaAgainst *Against *No reportFor
Federated HermesForForNo reportFor
AllianceBernsteinAgainst *Against *No reportFor
PIMCOAgainst *Against *No reportFor
AllspringAgainst *Against *No reportFor
MassMutualNo reportNo reportForNo report
Harbor FundsAgainst *No reportForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Raiffeisen Bank International AG meeting?

127 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 1 of 28 voted against management (3.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Raiffeisen Bank International AG on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Raiffeisen Bank International AG

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Raiffeisen Bank International AG with a meeting date within three days of 9 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.