Home / Companies / RELX PLC / 23 Apr 2026
RELX PLC: meeting of 23 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
255 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RELX PLC meeting of 23 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 96.2% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
548 vote records from 40 filers. 1 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
255 vote records from 225 filers. 9 of the 218 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
117 vote records from 40 filers. 2 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
12 vote records from 3 filers. 0 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
273 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
90 vote records from 37 filers. 2 of the 35 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
89 vote records from 26 filers. 1 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
26 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Corporate governance
16 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report | No report |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the RELX PLC meeting?
255 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 9 of 218 voted against management (4.1%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RELX PLC on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for RELX PLC
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RELX PLC with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.