Home / Companies / Reply SpA / 23 Apr 2024
Reply SpA: meeting of 23 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
63 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Reply SpA meeting of 23 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 14 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 45.2% of reported votes for; 9 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
33 vote records from 14 filers. 6 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
3 nominees; 46.5% of reported votes for; 37 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
183 vote records from 45 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 45 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
27 vote records from 24 filers. 15 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
149 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
148 vote records from 50 filers. 40 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
109 vote records from 50 filers. 0 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
81 vote records from 11 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)
68 vote records from 47 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 47 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Approve remuneration policy
59 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)
58 vote records from 37 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 37 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
56 vote records from 35 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 35 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
56 vote records from 35 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 35 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (C)
10 vote records from 10 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 10 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
4 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | For | For | Against | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Fidelity | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Dimensional | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Invesco | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | Against * | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| WisdomTree | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | Abstain or withhold * | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | Against | For | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Thrivent | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| First Trust | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | Against | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | Against | No report | For | For | For | No report | No report |
| Capital Group and American Funds | No report | For | No report | For | For | For | For | Against |
| MassMutual | No report | No report | Against | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Reply SpA meeting?
63 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 23 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 15 of 20 voted against management (75.0%). 6 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Reply SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Reply SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Reply SpA with a meeting date within three days of 23 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.