Home / Companies / Rio Tinto Limited / 1 May 2025
Rio Tinto Limited: meeting of 1 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
135 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Rio Tinto Limited meeting of 1 May 2025. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 99.2% of reported votes for; 7 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,607 vote records from 114 filers. 0 of the 114 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
155 vote records from 40 filers. 1 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
432 vote records from 114 filers. 0 of the 114 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
253 vote records from 113 filers. 0 of the 113 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
378 vote records from 97 filers. 0 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
195 vote records from 97 filers. 0 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
208 vote records from 110 filers. 23 of the 110 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
217 vote records from 113 filers. 0 of the 113 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
92 vote records from 17 filers. 1 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Requisitioned Resolution That the Company Instigates an Independent Review into the Possible...
203 vote records from 106 filers. 54 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 10. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For * |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | For * |
| Principal | For | No report | For | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | Against |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | No report | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Rio Tinto Limited meeting?
135 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 1 of 39 voted against management (2.6%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Rio Tinto Limited on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Rio Tinto Limited
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Rio Tinto Limited with a meeting date within three days of 1 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.