Home / Companies / Rio Tinto Plc / 3 Apr 2025
Rio Tinto Plc: meeting of 3 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
210 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Rio Tinto Plc meeting of 3 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 12 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 99.0% of reported votes for; 8 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,027 vote records from 175 filers. 0 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
1 nominee; 0.0% of reported votes for; 11 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
40 vote records from 12 filers. 0 of the 12 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
285 vote records from 63 filers. 2 of the 61 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
678 vote records from 175 filers. 1 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
45 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,027 vote records from 175 filers. 0 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
536 vote records from 148 filers. 0 of the 148 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
673 vote records from 175 filers. 1 of the 175 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
324 vote records from 171 filers. 23 of the 171 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
337 vote records from 173 filers. 0 of the 173 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
142 vote records from 23 filers. 0 of the 20 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Requisitioned Resolution That the Company Instigates an Independent Review into the Possible...
287 vote records from 161 filers. 82 of the 161 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | No report | For | For | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | Split or no vote | For | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | For | For | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Thrivent | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | For | Against * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Principal | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| MFS | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| DWS | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| Allspring | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
| MassMutual | For | No report | For | For | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | No report | For | Against |
| American Beacon | For | No report | No report | For | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Rio Tinto Plc meeting?
210 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 61 voted against management (3.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Rio Tinto Plc on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Rio Tinto Plc
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Rio Tinto Plc with a meeting date within three days of 3 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.