Home / Companies / RIO TINTO PLC / 4 Apr 2024
RIO TINTO PLC: meeting of 4 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
397 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RIO TINTO PLC meeting of 4 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
13 nominees; 99.1% of reported votes for; 3 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
2,469 vote records from 113 filers. 0 of the 110 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
780 vote records from 301 filers. 9 of the 287 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 14 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
386 vote records from 113 filers. 2 of the 110 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
13 vote records from 7 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
545 vote records from 110 filers. 0 of the 107 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
680 vote records from 120 filers. 1 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
545 vote records from 111 filers. 0 of the 108 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
171 vote records from 100 filers. 2 of the 98 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
131 vote records from 40 filers. 0 of the 36 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For |
| VanEck | For | No report | For |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For |
| Baird | No report | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the RIO TINTO PLC meeting?
397 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 4 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 9 of 287 voted against management (3.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RIO TINTO PLC on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for RIO TINTO PLC
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RIO TINTO PLC with a meeting date within three days of 4 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.