Home / Companies / RIO TINTO PLC / 3 Apr 2025
RIO TINTO PLC: meeting of 3 Apr 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
421 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the RIO TINTO PLC meeting of 3 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 12 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 98.4% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
1,949 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
732 vote records from 336 filers. 27 of the 327 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
334 vote records from 105 filers. 2 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
20 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
468 vote records from 102 filers. 1 of the 100 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
265 vote records from 83 filers. 1 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
298 vote records from 104 filers. 1 of the 102 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATEIssuer
ENVIRONMENT OR CLIMATE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
156 vote records from 99 filers. 13 of the 97 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
152 vote records from 96 filers. 4 of the 94 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
92 vote records from 32 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Requisitioned Resolution That the Company Instigates an Independent Review into the Possible...
117 vote records from 69 filers. 31 of the 69 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
2 vote records from 2 filers. 1 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 11. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | For | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | Against |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For | For * |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | No report | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For | No report |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report | No report |
| First Trust | For | For | For | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | For * |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | No report | For | For * |
| Principal | For | No report | For | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| Global X | For | No report | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For | For * |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | Against |
| MassMutual | No report | For | No report | No report |
| VanEck | For | No report | For | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the RIO TINTO PLC meeting?
421 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 3 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 27 of 327 voted against management (8.3%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by RIO TINTO PLC on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for RIO TINTO PLC
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing RIO TINTO PLC with a meeting date within three days of 3 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.