Home / Companies / Saipem SpA / 12 May 2026
Saipem SpA: meeting of 12 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
78 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Saipem SpA meeting of 12 May 2026. Their records fall into 11 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 85.2% of reported votes for; 9 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
177 vote records from 71 filers. 1 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
92 vote records from 19 filers. 0 of the 17 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
10 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
390 vote records from 71 filers. 0 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
371 vote records from 71 filers. 2 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
188 vote records from 71 filers. 1 of the 67 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
38 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
102 vote records from 51 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 51 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
82 vote records from 42 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
82 vote records from 42 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (C)
82 vote records from 42 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 42 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Voya | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Principal | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report | For | For | For | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Saipem SpA meeting?
78 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 0 of 17 voted against management (0.0%). 4 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Saipem SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Saipem SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Saipem SpA with a meeting date within three days of 12 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.