Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Sands China Ltd. / 22 May 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025107 filers reporting

Sands China Ltd.: meeting of 22 May 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

107 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Sands China Ltd. meeting of 22 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

3 nominees; 83.7% of reported votes for; 39 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

537 vote records from 105 filers. 11 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

89.5% for10.5% against10.5% against management105 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

3 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management6,640,799 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

179 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management105 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management443,940,159 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

716 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

6.7% for0.0% against93.3% other0.0% against management105 filers57.3% for42.7% against42.2% against management1,775,760,636 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

179 vote records from 105 filers. 2 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.1% for1.9% against1.9% against management105 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management443,940,159 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

194 vote records from 92 filers. 0 of the 92 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management92 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management432,194,660 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

69 vote records from 13 filers. 0 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management13 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management11,745,499 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors3. Auditor
VanguardForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForFor
FidelityForFor
DimensionalForFor
State Street and SPDRForFor
American CenturyForFor
Franklin TempletonForFor
InvescoForFor
EquitableForFor
Charles SchwabAgainst *For
Nuveen and TIAAForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor
J.P. MorganForFor
Goldman SachsForFor
WisdomTreeForFor
PGIM and PrudentialAgainst *For
Jackson National fundsForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForFor
SEIAgainst *For
T. Rowe PriceForFor
ThriventForFor
Lincoln FinancialForFor
VoyaForFor
Russell InvestmentsAgainst *For
NationwideForFor
Victory CapitalForFor
Brighthouse FundsForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleAgainst *For
BNY MellonForFor
PrincipalForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForFor
MFSForFor
TransamericaForFor
AllianceBernsteinForFor
VanEckAgainst *For
Dodge & CoxForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Sands China Ltd. meeting?

107 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 22 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 0 of 2 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Sands China Ltd. on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Sands China Ltd.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Sands China Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 22 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.