Vote Scores

Home / Companies / SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.) / 8 Apr 2026

Meeting · year to 30 June 20261,620 filers reporting

SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.): meeting of 8 Apr 2026

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

1,620 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.) meeting of 8 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

1

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

9 nominees; 94.3% of reported votes for; 92 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

9,148 vote records from 412 filers. 2 of the 409 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.3% for0.0% against0.7% other0.5% against management412 filers
2

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

2,538 vote records from 1,606 filers. 67 of the 1,560 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 46 filers reported this item without a management mark.

92.5% for3.9% against3.5% other4.3% against management1,606 filers97.6% for1.7% against0.7% other2.3% against management1,567,295,716 reported shares
3

AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer

Audit-related items (auditor ratification)

1,029 vote records from 408 filers. 24 of the 405 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.

93.4% for5.9% against0.7% other5.9% against management408 filers98.3% for1.7% against0.0% other1.7% against management609,245,441 reported shares
4

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

628 vote records from 287 filers. 1 of the 285 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

99.7% for0.0% against0.3% other0.4% against management287 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management446,538,469 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
5

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

1,063 vote records from 419 filers. 9 of the 415 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.1% for2.1% against0.7% other2.2% against management419 filers99.5% for0.5% against0.0% other0.5% against management610,118,167 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
6

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

202 vote records from 69 filers. 2 of the 68 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

97.1% for0.0% against2.9% other2.9% against management69 filers99.9% for0.0% against0.0% other0.1% against management133,358,105 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
7

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

198 vote records from 83 filers. 0 of the 81 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.

97.6% for0.0% against2.4% other0.0% against management83 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% other0.0% against management29,931,519 reported shares, counted once per item in this group
8

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

2 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management2 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management284,591 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family1. Directors2. Say-on-pay3. Auditor
VanguardForForFor
BlackRock and iSharesForForFor
FidelityForForFor
DimensionalForForFor
State Street and SPDRForForFor
American CenturyForForFor
Franklin TempletonForForFor
InvescoForForFor
EquitableForForFor
Charles SchwabForForFor
Nuveen and TIAAForAgainst *For
ProShares and ProFundsForForFor
John Hancock and ManulifeForForFor
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForForFor
J.P. MorganForForFor
Goldman SachsForForFor
WisdomTreeForForFor
PGIM and PrudentialForForFor
Jackson National fundsForForFor
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForForFor
SEIForForFor
T. Rowe PriceForForFor
ThriventForForFor
Lincoln FinancialForForFor
VoyaForForFor
First TrustForForFor
Russell InvestmentsForForFor
NationwideForForAgainst *
Victory CapitalForForFor
Brighthouse FundsForForFor
Guggenheim and RydexForForFor
Columbia ThreadneedleForForFor
BNY MellonForForAgainst *
PrincipalForForFor
Capital Group and American FundsForForFor
Pacific Life fundsForForFor
Global XForForFor
MFSForForFor
TransamericaForForFor
Federated HermesForForFor
AllianceBernsteinForForFor
Hartford FundsForForFor
DWSForForFor
PIMCOForForFor
AllspringForForFor
MassMutualForForFor
Harbor FundsForForFor
VirtusForAbstain or withhold *Against *
VanEckForForFor
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForForFor
Janus HendersonNo reportForNo report
Neuberger BermanForForFor
American BeaconForForFor
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForForFor
Lord AbbettForForFor
Cohen & SteersForForFor
Dodge & CoxNo reportForNo report
BairdNo reportForNo report
Artisan PartnersForForFor

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.) meeting?

1,620 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 8 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 67 of 1,560 voted against management (4.3%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.) on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.)

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SCHLUMBERGER LIMITED (SCHLUMBERGER N.V.) with a meeting date within three days of 8 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.