Home / Companies / Schneider Electric SE / 7 May 2025
Schneider Electric SE: meeting of 7 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
332 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Schneider Electric SE meeting of 7 May 2025. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
9 nominees; 44.4% of reported votes for; 242 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
4,698 vote records from 280 filers. 7 of the 274 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
5 nominees; 11.7% of reported votes for; 33 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
325 vote records from 44 filers. 7 of the 40 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
647 vote records from 95 filers. 9 of the 89 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
124 vote records from 52 filers. 4 of the 50 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
6,347 vote records from 280 filers. 0 of the 274 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
5,170 vote records from 284 filers. 3 of the 278 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
3,168 vote records from 280 filers. 0 of the 274 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
927 vote records from 45 filers. 0 of the 39 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
6 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against | No report | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against | For | For |
| Fidelity | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| American Century | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Invesco | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Equitable | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against | For | No report |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against | No report | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against | For | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against | No report | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Voya | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| First Trust | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Nationwide | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Principal | Against | No report | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Global X | Against | No report | No report | For |
| MFS | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Federated Hermes | Against | No report | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | Against | No report | No report | For |
| DWS | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Allspring | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | Against | No report | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against | For | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | Against | No report | No report |
| Lord Abbett | Against | No report | No report | No report |
| Dodge & Cox | Against | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Schneider Electric SE meeting?
332 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 9 of 89 voted against management (10.1%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Schneider Electric SE on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Schneider Electric SE
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Schneider Electric SE with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.