Home / Companies / Sika AG / 25 Mar 2025
Sika AG: meeting of 25 Mar 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
198 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Sika AG meeting of 25 Mar 2025. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 91.0% of reported votes for; 42 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,314 vote records from 168 filers. 1 of the 146 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
162 vote records from 61 filers. 3 of the 54 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 7 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
303 vote records from 168 filers. 0 of the 146 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
595 vote records from 163 filers. 0 of the 145 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 18 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,087 vote records from 169 filers. 2 of the 147 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,855 vote records from 168 filers. 0 of the 146 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 22 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESIssuer
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
56 vote records from 31 filers. 0 of the 25 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
184 vote records from 25 filers. 0 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For |
| American Century | For | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For |
| SEI | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For |
| Voya | For | No report | For |
| First Trust | For | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | For |
| Global X | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| MFS | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| DWS | For | No report | For |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For |
| Allspring | For | No report | For |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Sika AG meeting?
198 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 25 Mar 2025. On say-on-pay, 3 of 54 voted against management (5.6%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Sika AG on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Sika AG
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Sika AG with a meeting date within three days of 25 Mar 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.