Home / Companies / SNAM SpA / 14 May 2025
SNAM SpA: meeting of 14 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
139 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the SNAM SpA meeting of 14 May 2025. Their records fall into 13 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 73.7% of reported votes for; 13 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
143 vote records from 38 filers. 0 of the 22 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 16 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder
Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)
3 nominees; 68.3% of reported votes for; 85 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
494 vote records from 104 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 100 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
164 vote records from 42 filers. 2 of the 37 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
80 vote records from 24 filers. 0 of the 21 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
436 vote records from 118 filers. 0 of the 115 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,001 vote records from 119 filers. 0 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
853 vote records from 119 filers. 1 of the 116 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
189 vote records from 17 filers. 0 of the 14 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)
145 vote records from 84 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 82 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)
140 vote records from 81 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 79 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (C)
139 vote records from 80 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 79 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (D)
57 vote records from 23 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder
Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (E)
57 vote records from 23 filers. 1 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Directors | 3. Say-on-pay | 4. Auditor | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Fidelity | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Dimensional | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| American Century | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Invesco | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Equitable | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Goldman Sachs | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | No report | For | For | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Thrivent | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | No report | For | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| Voya | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| First Trust | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Nationwide | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Victory Capital | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | No report | For | No report | No report | For | No report | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Principal | For | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Pacific Life funds | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Transamerica | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
| Allspring | No report | For | No report | No report | For | Against | For | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the SNAM SpA meeting?
139 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 14 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 2 of 37 voted against management (5.4%). 5 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by SNAM SpA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for SNAM SpA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing SNAM SpA with a meeting date within three days of 14 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.