Home / Companies / Spotify Technology SA / 15 Apr 2026
Spotify Technology SA: meeting of 15 Apr 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
407 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Spotify Technology SA meeting of 15 Apr 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
12 nominees; 84.7% of reported votes for; 190 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
10,463 vote records from 379 filers. 22 of the 374 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
44 vote records from 26 filers. 4 of the 23 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
883 vote records from 379 filers. 1 of the 373 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,710 vote records from 374 filers. 0 of the 369 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
868 vote records from 378 filers. 171 of the 372 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,274 vote records from 375 filers. 2 of the 370 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
290 vote records from 79 filers. 0 of the 76 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
7 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Spotify Technology SA meeting?
407 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 15 Apr 2026. On say-on-pay, 4 of 23 voted against management (17.4%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Spotify Technology SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Spotify Technology SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Spotify Technology SA with a meeting date within three days of 15 Apr 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.