Home / Companies / Tenaris SA / 12 May 2026
Tenaris SA: meeting of 12 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
157 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Tenaris SA meeting of 12 May 2026. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 35.5% of reported votes for; 94 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
306 vote records from 137 filers. 77 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
119 vote records from 44 filers. 28 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
270 vote records from 137 filers. 3 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,041 vote records from 137 filers. 0 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
478 vote records from 137 filers. 3 of the 128 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,282 vote records from 138 filers. 1 of the 129 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 9 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
128 vote records from 14 filers. 0 of the 13 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | Against * | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | Against * | For |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | Against * | No report | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | No report | For |
| Franklin Templeton | Against * | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | For |
| Equitable | For | No report | For |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Against * | No report | For |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | Against * | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | Against * | No report | For |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Split or no vote * | For |
| Goldman Sachs | Against * | No report | For |
| WisdomTree | Against * | No report | For |
| PGIM and Prudential | Against * | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | Against * | Against * | For |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | Split or no vote | No report | Split or no vote |
| Thrivent | Against * | No report | For |
| Lincoln Financial | For | Against * | For |
| Voya | Against * | No report | For |
| First Trust | Against * | No report | For |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | Against * | No report | For |
| Victory Capital | Against * | No report | For |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | No report | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | Against * | No report | For |
| BNY Mellon | Against * | No report | For |
| Principal | Against * | No report | For |
| MFS | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | Against * | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | No report | For |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| DWS | Against * | No report | For |
| PIMCO | Against * | No report | For |
| Allspring | Against * | No report | For |
| MassMutual | Against * | No report | For |
| Harbor Funds | Against * | Against * | For |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Tenaris SA meeting?
157 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 12 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 28 of 38 voted against management (73.7%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Tenaris SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Tenaris SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Tenaris SA with a meeting date within three days of 12 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.