Home / Companies / Ternium SA / 6 May 2025
Ternium SA: meeting of 6 May 2025
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
35 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Ternium SA meeting of 6 May 2025. Their records fall into 7 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 61.1% of reported votes for; 10 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
36 vote records from 30 filers. 10 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4 vote records from 4 filers. 0 of the 4 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
39 vote records from 29 filers. 0 of the 29 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
62 vote records from 28 filers. 1 of the 28 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
35 vote records from 31 filers. 15 of the 31 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
122 vote records from 30 filers. 0 of the 30 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
9 vote records from 5 filers. 0 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For |
| Fidelity | For | For |
| State Street and SPDR | Against * | For |
| Invesco | Against * | For |
| Equitable | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | For |
| Russell Investments | Against * | For |
| Principal | For | For |
| Global X | Against * | For |
| Hartford Funds | Against * | For |
| VanEck | Against * | For |
| American Beacon | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Ternium SA meeting?
35 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 6 May 2025. On say-on-pay, 0 of 4 voted against management (0.0%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Ternium SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Ternium SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Ternium SA with a meeting date within three days of 6 May 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.