Home / Companies / The Coca-Cola Company / 1 May 2024
The Coca-Cola Company: meeting of 1 May 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,899 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Coca-Cola Company meeting of 1 May 2024. Their records fall into 9 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
14 nominees; 91.5% of reported votes for; 328 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
17,491 vote records from 460 filers. 5 of the 457 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
4,532 vote records from 1,850 filers. 212 of the 1,800 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 50 filers reported this item without a management mark.
10 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
1,245 vote records from 456 filers. 19 of the 453 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
183 vote records from 75 filers. 1 of the 75 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,462 vote records from 482 filers. 8 of the 478 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report on non-sugar sweeteners
1,160 vote records from 437 filers. 70 of the 436 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report on risks caused by the decline in the quality of...
1,153 vote records from 433 filers. 71 of the 432 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
OTHER SOCIAL ISSUESSecurity holder
Vote on a shareowner proposal requesting a report on risks created by the Company's diversity, equity and...
1,153 vote records from 433 filers. 24 of the 431 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
4 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. Those figures are left out of the share split below; the counts of filers include them. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
154 vote records from 19 filers. 4 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal | 8. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Invesco | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Equitable | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Charles Schwab | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | Against | Against |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| WisdomTree | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | Against * | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| SEI | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| T. Rowe Price | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Thrivent | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Voya | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| First Trust | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Russell Investments | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Nationwide | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Victory Capital | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Principal | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Capital Group and American Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Global X | For | For | For | No report | No report | No report |
| MFS | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Transamerica | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Federated Hermes | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| AllianceBernstein | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Hartford Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| DWS | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| PIMCO | For | Against * | Against * | For * | For * | Against |
| Allspring | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Harbor Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Virtus | For | For | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Janus Henderson | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Neuberger Berman | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| American Beacon | For | Against * | For | For * | For * | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Lord Abbett | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
| Dodge & Cox | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | No report | Split or no vote | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report | No report | No report |
| Artisan Partners | For | For | For | Against | Against | Against |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Coca-Cola Company meeting?
1,899 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 1 May 2024. On say-on-pay, 212 of 1,800 voted against management (11.8%). 3 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Coca-Cola Company on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Coca-Cola Company
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Coca-Cola Company with a meeting date within three days of 1 May 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.