Home / Companies / The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. / 21 Jun 2024
The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd.: meeting of 21 Jun 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
51 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. meeting of 21 Jun 2024. Their records fall into 15 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
2 nominees; 96.2% of reported votes for; 4 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
158 vote records from 49 filers. 2 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
5 vote records from 2 filers. 0 of the 2 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
14 vote records from 6 filers. 0 of the 6 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
74 vote records from 49 filers. 1 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
261 vote records from 49 filers. 0 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
75 vote records from 49 filers. 0 of the 49 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
7 vote records from 6 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Amend Articles to Add Provision on Disposal of Shares Held as Cross-Shareholdings
71 vote records from 48 filers. 7 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Amend Articles to Convert into Domestic Standard Bank
71 vote records from 48 filers. 2 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
COMPENSATIONSecurity holder
Amend Articles to Require Individual Compensation Disclosure for Directors
71 vote records from 48 filers. 40 of the 48 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal: Amend Articles of Incorporation (Verification of the Objective of...
64 vote records from 43 filers. 27 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Initiate Share Repurchase Program
65 vote records from 43 filers. 19 of the 43 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Approve Additional Allocation of Income so that Final Dividend per Share Equals to JPY 62
58 vote records from 38 filers. 23 of the 38 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTURESecurity holder
Shareholder Proposal: Approve Appropriation of Surplus
6 vote records from 5 filers. 5 of the 5 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
20 vote records from 10 filers. 5 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 3. Auditor | 8. Proposal | 9. Proposal | 10. Proposal | 11. Proposal | 12. Proposal | 13. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Dimensional | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| American Century | For | No report | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against | Against |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Invesco | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Equitable | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | No report | Against | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against | Against |
| John Hancock and Manulife | Against * | For | For * | For * | For * | For * | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Split or no vote | For * | Against | For * | For * | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Split or no vote | Against | Against | For * | For * | No report | No report |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| First Trust | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | No report | Against | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For * | Against | For * | For * | For * | For * |
| MFS | For | No report | Against | Against | For * | Against | Against | For * |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. meeting?
51 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 21 Jun 2024. On say-on-pay, 0 of 2 voted against management (0.0%). 7 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing The Hachijuni Bank, Ltd. with a meeting date within three days of 21 Jun 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.