Home / Companies / THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V. / 7 May 2026
THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V.: meeting of 7 May 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
587 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V. meeting of 7 May 2026. Their records fall into 10 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
10 nominees; 97.2% of reported votes for; 12 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,214 vote records from 161 filers. 2 of the 158 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
707 vote records from 457 filers. 6 of the 436 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
665 vote records from 161 filers. 0 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
0 filers reported share counts too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSESIssuer
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
29 vote records from 10 filers. 0 of the 10 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
904 vote records from 161 filers. 0 of the 157 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
833 vote records from 165 filers. 3 of the 162 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 3 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,154 vote records from 160 filers. 0 of the 156 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 4 filers reported this item without a management mark.
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
190 vote records from 37 filers. 0 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 11 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
Proposal to amend the Articles of Association of the Company
31 vote records from 20 filers. 3 of the 19 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
1 vote records from 1 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 9. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For | No report |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For | No report |
| Dimensional | For | No report | For | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | For | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | For | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For | No report |
| Invesco | For | No report | For | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | For | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | For | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | For | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | For | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | No report |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For | No report |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | For | No report |
| Thrivent | For | No report | For | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | For | No report |
| Voya | For | No report | For | No report |
| First Trust | For | For | For | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For | No report |
| Nationwide | For | No report | For | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | For | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | For | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | For | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For | No report |
| Transamerica | For | No report | For | No report |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | For | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | For | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | For | No report |
| Neuberger Berman | For | No report | For | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | No report | For | No report | No report |
| Baird | No report | For | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V. meeting?
587 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 7 May 2026. On say-on-pay, 6 of 436 voted against management (1.4%). One proposal from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing THE MAGNUM ICE CREAM COMPANY N.V. with a meeting date within three days of 7 May 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.