Home / Companies / Unipol Assicurazioni SpA / 29 Apr 2025

Meeting · year to 30 June 2025124 filers reporting

Unipol Assicurazioni SpA: meeting of 29 Apr 2025

Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item

124 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Unipol Assicurazioni SpA meeting of 29 Apr 2025. Their records fall into 15 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

Items

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer

Director elections

2 nominees; 57.1% of reported votes for; 21 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

178 vote records from 21 filers. 2 of the 8 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 13 filers reported this item without a management mark.

85.7% for9.5% against4.8% other25.0% against management21 filers

DIRECTOR ELECTIONSSecurity holder

Director elections (nominees put forward by security holders)

2 nominees; 57.9% of reported votes for; 75 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.

350 vote records from 92 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 91 filers reported this item without a management mark.

18.5% for3.3% against78.3% other0.0% against management92 filers

SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer

Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)

49 vote records from 27 filers. 22 of the 26 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.

7.4% for85.2% against7.4% other84.6% against management27 filers8.7% for89.8% against1.5% other80.2% against management9,452,693 reported shares

CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer

CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

569 vote records from 105 filers. 0 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

98.1% for0.0% against1.9% other0.0% against management105 filers85.2% for14.8% against0.0% other14.7% against management135,958,824 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

COMPENSATIONIssuer

COMPENSATION: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

839 vote records from 106 filers. 53 of the 106 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

39.6% for51.9% against8.5% other50.0% against management106 filers61.6% for38.4% against0.0% other37.8% against management195,846,671 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

945 vote records from 105 filers. 1 of the 105 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

99.0% for0.0% against1.0% other1.0% against management105 filers94.6% for0.5% against4.9% other5.4% against management185,477,500 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

OTHERIssuer

OTHER: management items

Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.

112 vote records from 9 filers. 0 of the 9 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.

100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management9 filers100.0% for0.0% against0.0% against management910,394 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (A)

140 vote records from 75 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 74 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for5.3% against0.0% against management75 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% against management36,087,903 reported shares

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: CORPORATE GOVERNANCE (B)

140 vote records from 75 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 74 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.7% for5.3% against0.0% against management75 filers99.8% for0.2% against0.0% against management36,087,903 reported shares

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Deliberations Pursuant to Article 2390 of Civil Code Re: Decisions Inherent to Authorization of Board...

140 vote records from 75 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 74 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for93.3% against6.7% other0.0% against management75 filers0.0% for99.7% against0.3% other0.0% against management36,087,903 reported shares

CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder

Fix Number of Directors

140 vote records from 75 filers. 0 of the 1 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 74 filers reported this item without a management mark.

96.0% for4.0% against0.0% against management75 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% against management36,087,903 reported shares

AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (A)

132 vote records from 71 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 71 filers reported this item without a management mark.

4.2% for94.4% against1.4% other71 filers0.1% for99.9% against0.0% other35,716,166 reported shares

AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (B)

132 vote records from 71 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 71 filers reported this item without a management mark.

94.4% for4.2% against1.4% other71 filers99.9% for0.1% against0.0% other35,716,166 reported shares

AUDIT-RELATEDSecurity holder

Shareholder proposal: AUDIT-RELATED (C)

43 vote records from 17 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 17 filers reported this item without a management mark.

0.0% for94.1% against5.9% other17 filers0.0% for99.9% against0.1% other10,005,014 reported shares

Several categoriesSecurity holder

Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)

Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.

39 vote records from 21 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 21 filers reported this item without a management mark.

42.9% for52.4% against4.8% other21 filers21.1% for78.7% against0.2% other4,312,090 reported shares, counted once per item in this group

How the largest families voted

Family	1. Directors	2. Directors	3. Say-on-pay	8. Proposal	9. Proposal	10. Proposal	11. Proposal	12. Proposal
Vanguard	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
BlackRock and iShares	For	For	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Fidelity	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Dimensional	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
State Street and SPDR	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
American Century	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Franklin Templeton	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	Against	For
Invesco	No report	Abstain or withhold	No report	For	For	Abstain or withhold	For	Abstain or withhold
Equitable	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Abstain or withhold	For	Against
Charles Schwab	For	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Nuveen and TIAA	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
John Hancock and Manulife	No report	For	Against *	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert	No report	Split or no vote	No report	Against	Against	Against	For	Against
J.P. Morgan	For	For	Against *	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Goldman Sachs	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
WisdomTree	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
PGIM and Prudential	For	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Jackson National funds	No report	For	Against *	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Northern Trust and FlexShares	No report	Split or no vote	Against *	For	For	Against	For	Against
SEI	For	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
T. Rowe Price	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Thrivent	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Lincoln Financial	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	No report
Voya	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
First Trust	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Russell Investments	For	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report
Nationwide	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Abstain or withhold	For	Against
Victory Capital	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Brighthouse Funds	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	No report
Columbia Threadneedle	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
BNY Mellon	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Principal	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
MFS	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
Transamerica	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
AllianceBernstein	No report	Split or no vote	No report	Against	Against	Against	For	Against
PIMCO	No report	Split or no vote	No report	For	For	Against	For	Against
MassMutual	No report	No report	Against *	No report	No report	No report	No report	No report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

Questions

How did large funds vote at the Unipol Assicurazioni SpA meeting?

124 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 29 Apr 2025. On say-on-pay, 22 of 26 voted against management (84.6%). 7 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.

Is this the meeting result?

No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Unipol Assicurazioni SpA on Form 8-K.

Why are director elections shown as counts only?

Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.

Every meeting on file for Unipol Assicurazioni SpA

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Unipol Assicurazioni SpA with a meeting date within three days of 29 Apr 2025. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.