Vote Scores

Home / Companies / Universal Health Services, Inc.

Company · votes reported on Form N-PXUHS · SEC company no. 352915

Universal Health Services, Inc.

How funds and institutional managers reported voting their shares, year to 30 June 2026

Filers reporting
797year to 30 June 2026
Against management on pay
4.9%38 of 769 reporting filers
Same, by reported shares
2.8%shares reported on Form N-PX
Meetings on file
3across 3 seasons
91.6% for4.9% against3.5% other4.9% against management793 filers on say-on-pay

foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management

For the year to 30 June 2026, 797 funds and managers listed Universal Health Services, Inc. in their Form N-PX filings (one meeting).

On the advisory vote on executive pay, 38 of the 769 filers that reported a position voted against management (4.9%), 1.6 percentage points below the median company on this site (6.6%). By reported shares the figure is 2.8% (median 2.9%). These are shares of the filers reporting on Form N-PX, not of all votes cast at the meeting.

All 53 of the largest fund families that reported a say-on-pay vote here voted with management.

Meetings

Meeting dateSeasonFilers reportingItemsAgainst management on pay
20 May 2026year to 30 June 202679654.9%
14 May 2025year to 30 June 202523840.0%
15 May 2024year to 30 June 202422950.0%

Meetings with 20 or more reporting filers have their own page with every item. Dates are as filers typed them; dates up to three days apart are treated as one meeting.

Say-on-pay: this company and the median

year to 30 June 2026Universal Health Services, Inc.Median company
Reporting filers voting against management4.9%6.6%
Reported shares voted against management2.8%2.9%

Among filers reporting on Form N-PX. The median is over 3,799 companies with a say-on-pay item reported by 20 or more filers.

How the largest families voted

Meeting of 20 May 2026: say-on-pay and each shareholder proposal that could be told apart.

FamilySay-on-payProposal AProposal B
VanguardForAgainstAgainst
BlackRock and iSharesForAgainstAgainst
FidelityForAgainstFor *
DimensionalForAgainstFor *
State Street and SPDRForAgainstFor *
American CenturyForAgainstFor *
Franklin TempletonForAgainstFor *
InvescoForAgainstFor *
EquitableForAgainstFor *
Charles SchwabForAgainstFor *
Nuveen and TIAAForFor *For *
ProShares and ProFundsForAgainstFor *
John Hancock and ManulifeForAgainstFor *
Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and CalvertForFor *For *
J.P. MorganForFor *Against
Goldman SachsForAgainstFor *
WisdomTreeForAgainstAgainst
PGIM and PrudentialForAgainstFor *
Jackson National fundsForAgainstFor *
Northern Trust and FlexSharesForAgainstFor *
SEIForFor *For *
T. Rowe PriceForAgainstAgainst
ThriventForAgainstFor *
Lincoln FinancialForAgainst *For *
VoyaForAgainstFor *
First TrustForAgainstFor *
Russell InvestmentsForFor *For *
NationwideForAgainstFor *
Victory CapitalForAgainstFor *
Brighthouse FundsForAgainst *For *
Guggenheim and RydexForAgainstFor *
Columbia ThreadneedleForAgainstFor *
BNY MellonForAgainstAgainst
PrincipalForFor *For *
Pacific Life fundsForAgainstAgainst
Global XForFor *For *
MFSForFor *For *
TransamericaForAgainstFor *
Federated HermesForAgainstFor *
AllianceBernsteinForFor *For *
Hartford FundsForNo reportNo report
DWSForAgainstFor *
PIMCOForAgainstFor *
AllspringForAgainstFor *
MassMutualForAgainstFor *
Harbor FundsForFor *For *
VirtusForAgainstFor *
Macquarie and Delaware FundsForNo reportNo report
Janus HendersonForNo reportNo report
Neuberger BermanForNo reportNo report
American BeaconForAgainstFor *
Natixis and Loomis SaylesForAgainstFor *
BairdForNo reportNo report

* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.

By season

SeasonFilers reportingAgainst management on pay, filersBy reported sharesSay-on-pay split
year to 30 June 20242300.0%21.2%
year to 30 June 20252390.0%0.0%
year to 30 June 20267974.9%2.8%

Category mix

Share of the vote records reported for this company, by the category filers chose.

CategoryVote recordsShare
AUDIT-RELATED1,81422.8%
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTES1,38717.4%
DIRECTOR ELECTIONS1,27816.0%
SHAREHOLDER RIGHTS AND DEFENSES1,13014.2%
COMPENSATION1,01512.7%
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE6418.0%
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSION6388.0%
CAPITAL STRUCTURE690.9%

Questions

How did large funds vote at Universal Health Services, Inc.?

For the year to 30 June 2026, 769 Form N-PX filers reported a say-on-pay vote at Universal Health Services, Inc.; 38 voted against management (4.9%). The table on this page lists the position of each of the largest fund families on say-on-pay and on each shareholder proposal that could be told apart in the filings.

Were there shareholder proposals at Universal Health Services, Inc.?

Filers reported 2 proposals from security holders that could be told apart in the year to 30 June 2026. Across them, 22.7% of reporting filers voted for at the median proposal.

Is this the meeting result?

No. The figures are shares of the funds and managers that file Form N-PX, and of the shares they reported. Holders that do not file the form (individuals, most foreign investors, insiders) are not included, so the split here can differ widely from the certified result, which Universal Health Services, Inc. reports on Form 8-K.

Where does the data come from?

From Form N-PX filings on the SEC's EDGAR system, grouped by company. Filers type company names and meeting dates themselves; this site groups spellings of the same company and folds meeting dates up to three days apart. Data runs through 23 Sep 2026; the median compares 3,799 companies.

Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings that list Universal Health Services, Inc., grouped by company. The name is the most common spelling among filers; the ticker and SEC company number come from the SEC company tickers file, matched on the exact name. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026; page built 26 Sep 2026.