Home / Companies / VINCI SA / 9 Apr 2024
VINCI SA: meeting of 9 Apr 2024
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
237 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the VINCI SA meeting of 9 Apr 2024. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
1 nominee; 99.8% of reported votes for; no filer withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
408 vote records from 209 filers. 0 of the 208 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
116 vote records from 53 filers. 3 of the 51 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
112 vote records from 62 filers. 1 of the 62 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,372 vote records from 209 filers. 0 of the 208 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
2,341 vote records from 210 filers. 2 of the 209 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. That figure is left out of the share split below; the count of filers includes it. How that is decided
CORPORATE GOVERNANCEIssuer
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,070 vote records from 184 filers. 0 of the 183 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
OTHERIssuer
OTHER: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
638 vote records from 171 filers. 0 of the 170 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
One filer reported a share count too large to be the holding described. No share split is published for this item. How that is decided
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
6 vote records from 1 filers. No filer marked a management recommendation, so no against-management figure is reported. 1 filer reported this item without a management mark.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | No report | For |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | No report | No report |
| Fidelity | For | No report | For |
| Dimensional | For | No report | No report |
| State Street and SPDR | For | No report | No report |
| American Century | For | No report | No report |
| Franklin Templeton | For | No report | For |
| Invesco | For | No report | No report |
| Equitable | For | No report | No report |
| Charles Schwab | For | No report | For |
| Nuveen and TIAA | For | No report | No report |
| ProShares and ProFunds | For | No report | No report |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | For | For |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | No report | No report |
| J.P. Morgan | For | For | No report |
| Goldman Sachs | For | No report | No report |
| WisdomTree | For | No report | No report |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | No report | For |
| Jackson National funds | For | For | For |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | For | No report |
| SEI | For | No report | For |
| T. Rowe Price | For | No report | No report |
| Thrivent | For | No report | No report |
| Lincoln Financial | For | No report | No report |
| Voya | For | No report | No report |
| First Trust | For | No report | No report |
| Russell Investments | For | No report | For |
| Nationwide | For | No report | No report |
| Victory Capital | For | No report | No report |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | For | For |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | No report | No report |
| BNY Mellon | For | No report | No report |
| Principal | For | No report | For |
| Pacific Life funds | For | No report | No report |
| Global X | For | No report | For |
| Transamerica | For | No report | No report |
| Federated Hermes | For | No report | For |
| AllianceBernstein | For | No report | No report |
| Hartford Funds | For | No report | For |
| DWS | For | No report | No report |
| PIMCO | For | No report | No report |
| Allspring | For | No report | No report |
| MassMutual | For | For | For |
| Harbor Funds | For | Against * | For |
| Virtus | For | No report | No report |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | For | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | No report | No report |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For |
| Cohen & Steers | For | For | For |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the VINCI SA meeting?
237 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 9 Apr 2024. On say-on-pay, 3 of 51 voted against management (5.9%). The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by VINCI SA on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for VINCI SA
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing VINCI SA with a meeting date within three days of 9 Apr 2024. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.