Home / Companies / Workday, Inc. / 16 Jun 2026
Workday, Inc.: meeting of 16 Jun 2026
Votes reported on Form N-PX, item by item
1,074 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the Workday, Inc. meeting of 16 Jun 2026. Their records fall into 8 items below, in ballot order: management items first, then proposals from security holders. Each bar shows how the reporting filers split; it is not the result of the meeting.
foragainstabstain, withhold or otheramber tick: the portion cast against management
Items
DIRECTOR ELECTIONSIssuer
Director elections
4 nominees; 60.8% of reported votes for; 233 filers withheld from or voted against at least one nominee.
3,212 vote records from 270 filers. 36 of the 265 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
SECTION 14A SAY-ON-PAY VOTESIssuer
Advisory vote on executive pay (say-on-pay)
1,832 vote records from 1,068 filers. 632 of the 1,024 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 44 filers reported this item without a management mark.
AUDIT-RELATEDIssuer
Audit-related items (auditor ratification)
804 vote records from 270 filers. 3 of the 265 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CAPITAL STRUCTUREIssuer
CAPITAL STRUCTURE: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
119 vote records from 46 filers. 9 of the 44 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 2 filers reported this item without a management mark.
COMPENSATIONIssuer
COMPENSATION: management items
Management items in this category are shown together; filers word and number them differently.
1,536 vote records from 281 filers. 112 of the 275 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 6 filers reported this item without a management mark.
DIVERSITY, EQUITY, AND INCLUSIONSecurity holder
To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of employee retention rates by...
788 vote records from 265 filers. 30 of the 260 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCESecurity holder
To consider and vote upon a stockholder proposal regarding disclosure of voting results based on share class.
788 vote records from 265 filers. 205 of the 260 filers that marked the item either way voted against management. 5 filers reported this item without a management mark.
Several categoriesSecurity holder
Shareholder proposals (not separable from the filings)
Filers described these proposals in wordings that could not be matched to one another, so they are shown together.
10 vote records from 3 filers. 1 of the 3 filers that marked the item either way voted against management.
How the largest families voted
| Family | 1. Directors | 2. Say-on-pay | 3. Auditor | 6. Proposal | 7. Proposal |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vanguard | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| BlackRock and iShares | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Fidelity | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Dimensional | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| State Street and SPDR | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| American Century | Split or no vote | For | For | Against | For * |
| Franklin Templeton | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Invesco | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Equitable | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Charles Schwab | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Nuveen and TIAA | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| ProShares and ProFunds | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| John Hancock and Manulife | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Morgan Stanley, Eaton Vance and Calvert | For | Against * | For | For * | For * |
| J.P. Morgan | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Goldman Sachs | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| WisdomTree | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| PGIM and Prudential | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Jackson National funds | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Northern Trust and FlexShares | For | Against * | For | For * | For * |
| SEI | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| T. Rowe Price | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Thrivent | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Lincoln Financial | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Voya | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| First Trust | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Russell Investments | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Nationwide | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Victory Capital | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Brighthouse Funds | For | Against | For | Against * | For * |
| Guggenheim and Rydex | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Columbia Threadneedle | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| BNY Mellon | For | Against * | For | Against | Against |
| Principal | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Pacific Life funds | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Global X | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Transamerica | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Federated Hermes | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| AllianceBernstein | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Hartford Funds | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| DWS | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| PIMCO | Against * | Against * | Against * | For * | For * |
| Allspring | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote | Split or no vote |
| MassMutual | For | For | For | Against | For * |
| Virtus | Against * | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| VanEck | Split or no vote | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Macquarie and Delaware Funds | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| Janus Henderson | For | Against * | For | Against | For * |
| Neuberger Berman | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
| American Beacon | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Natixis and Loomis Sayles | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Harris Associates and Oakmark | For | For | For | Against | Against |
| Baird | No report | Against * | No report | No report | No report |
* against management. A family's position is the way most of its reported shares were voted across its filers; "split" means no single position led. "No report" means none of the family's filers listed the item.
Questions
How did large funds vote at the Workday, Inc. meeting?
1,074 Form N-PX filers reported votes at the meeting of 16 Jun 2026. On say-on-pay, 632 of 1,024 voted against management (61.7%). 2 proposals from security holders could be told apart in the filings. The family table lists each of the largest families item by item.
Is this the meeting result?
No. These are the votes of funds and managers that file Form N-PX, counted by filer and by the shares they reported. The certified result, which includes every shareholder, is reported by Workday, Inc. on Form 8-K.
Why are director elections shown as counts only?
Director records name the nominee. This site does not publish pages or rows about individuals, so for director elections it keeps the number of nominees and the split of votes and discards the wording.
Every meeting on file for Workday, Inc.
Provenance: SEC EDGAR, Form N-PX and N-PX/A filings listing Workday, Inc. with a meeting date within three days of 16 Jun 2026. Proposal titles are the most common wording among filers and are replaced by the SEC category where a wording could name a person. Not verified by the SEC. Filings read through 23 Sep 2026.